Effect of Personalized AI-Driven Recommendations on Customer Retention in E-Commerce Platforms

Authors

Lena Fischer,James O. Thornton Effect of Personalized AI-Driven Recommendations on Customer Retention in E-Commerce Platforms

DOI:

Keywords:

Personalized recommendations, customer retention, collaborative filtering, e-commerce analytics, machine learning, customer lifetime value, recommendation fatigue, difference-in-differences

Abstract

This study examines the causal impact of personalized AI-driven recommendation systems on customer retention metrics across e-commerce platforms. Drawing on a longitudinal dataset of 2.4 million anonymized customer transaction records spanning 36 months (January 2022 – December 2024) from four major e-commerce platforms — FlipNest (India), CartBridge (Southeast Asia), NovaShop (Germany), and RetailAxis (United States) — we employ a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) framework augmented with propensity score matching to isolate the effect of AI recommendation exposure from confounding factors. Our findings reveal that customers exposed to personalized AI recommendations demonstrate a statistically significant 34.7% improvement in 12-month retention rates (p < 0.001), a 28.3% increase in average order frequency, and a 19.6% uplift in customer lifetime value (CLV) compared to matched controls. Collaborative filtering-based models outperform content-based systems by 11.2 percentage points on repeat purchase probability. However, the effects are heterogeneous: high-income segments show diminishing marginal returns beyond the third recommendation touchpoint, while first-time buyers exhibit non-linear sensitivity to recommendation relevance scores. We further identify recommendation fatigue as a significant moderating variable that attenuates retention gains by up to 22% when exposure frequency exceeds platform-specific thresholds. This paper contributes a scalable measurement framework for AI recommendation ROI and offers actionable thresholds for deployment across market segments.

Downloads 23 and Views 0

References

1. Anderson E, Kumar S, Patel R. Quantifying streaming recommendation fatigue: Evidence from a large-scale platform experiment. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2020. p. 1847–56. 2. Arora N, Dreze X, Ghose A, Hess JD, Iyengar R, Jing B, et al. Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalisation, customisation, and choice. Mark Lett. 2008;19(3–4):305–21. 3. Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424. 4. Bain & Company. Putting numbers to customer retention economics. Boston (MA): Bain Insight Report; 2023. 5. Bart Y, Shankar V, Sultan F, Urban GL. Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all websites and consumers? J Mark. 2005;69(4):133–52. 6. Brehm JW. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press; 1966. 7. Chen X, Li S, Li H, Jiang S, Qi Y, Song L. Generative adversarial user model for a reinforcement learning-based recommendation system. In: Proceedings of ICML; 2019. p. 1052–61. 8. Chernozhukov V, Demirer M, Duflo E, Fernandez-Val I. Generic machine learning inference on heterogeneous treatment effects in randomised experiments. NBER Working Paper No. 24678; 2018. 9. Covington P, Adams J, Sargin E. Deep neural networks for YouTube recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems; 2016. p. 191–98.

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Lena Fischer,James O. Thornton. (2024). Effect of Personalized AI-Driven Recommendations on Customer Retention in E-Commerce Platforms International Journal of Management, Engineering and Social Sciences,1(1), 4-11.